Saturday, August 16, 2008

Computer Simulations Showcase Aluminum's Odd Behavior

By Sarah Graham

Its conductivity, could behave like a ceramic or semiconductor in some situations, according to a new report. The metal may also endure mechanical stress better than copper, which is typically considered to be a stiffer metal, in nanotechnology applications. The findings, published today in the journal Science, could point to improved nanoelectronics.

Ju Li of Ohio State University and his colleagues used quantum mechanics to model the behavior of one-atom-thick layers of both aluminum and copper. Specifically, they studied a process known as pure shear strain, in which a layer of atoms slides over a second layer of atoms. The reliability and durability of very small electronic devices, in which temperatures fluctuations often cause materials to expand or contract, depends in part on how their components react to the effects of shear strain. The researchers determined that two layers of copper atoms typically slide over each other quite smoothly. But aluminum layers don't slide and instead hop across one another, the team found. The scientists suggest that so-called directional bonding, in which atoms on neighboring layers share electrons (see image), could be responsible for the observed movement. Such bonds are often found in ceramics and semiconductors, but aren't usually present in malleable metals like aluminum. According to Li, "this could mean that aluminum behaves more like ceramics in certain ways than anyone had previously thought." At the atomic level, aluminum was also 32 percent stronger than copper, according to the team's simulations. "We know copper is three times heavier than aluminum, and significantly stiffer than aluminum under normal conditions," Li says. "But when we looked at large shear strains, aluminum won hands down."


Source: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=computer-simulations-show

Friday, August 15, 2008

Lightweight aluminum v. a hand grenade, who wins?


Concrete and steel are the materials of choice when building buildings and vehicles that will protect soldiers from enemy fire. But a group of Norwegian researchers are testing another option: lightweight aluminum panels that can be filled with densely packed dirt, gravel, sand or any other nearby substance to provide protection without adding a lot of weight to a military's vehicles or structures, according to a recent report in the Norwegian research magazine Gemini. The aluminum panels are designed to fit together and any substance used to fill the cavity could be emptied out of the bottom of the panel before it is moved.

The Norwegian University of Science and Technology's SIMLab (Structural Impact Laboratory) also searching for a substance that can absorb the pressure exerted on the underside of a tank by a landmine explosion without adding a lot of weight to the vehicle. One proposed option is developing plates made from aluminum foam, which could absorb the impact of a bullet or piece of shrapnel and keep it from shredding the soldier on the other side of the armor. Such foam, basically a porous version of aluminum, is being developed by a number of companies, including Alcoa, Inc. in Alcoa Center, Pa., and Toronto's Cymat Technologies Ltd. and would be nonflammable and recyclable.

SIMLab researchers, working with the Norwegian Defence Estates Agency (NDEA), a branch of the Norwegian Defense Ministry responsible for the Norwegian camps and compounds involved in international operations, say they have tested the aluminum panels in a full-scale explosion that was equivalent to four tons of TNT detonated from 394 feet (120 meters) away. The target of that explosion, a container protected by aluminum panels received just minor damage, Gemini reports.

Source: http://www.sciam.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=lightweight-aluminum-v-a-hand-grena-2008-08-14&sc=rss

Monday, August 4, 2008

Corrosion Concerns on Aluminum for Aircraft Structure

Aluminum Usage in Boeing
I found this article pretty interesting:

Boeing designs airplanes to resist corrosion through selection of the proper materials and finishes and the use of drainage, sealants, and corrosion inhibitors. These designs are based on knowledge of what causes corrosion and the types of corrosion that occur in airplane structure. In addition, following a corrosion control program is necessary throughout the service life of the airplane. These activities are essential for controlling corrosion to a predictable, manageable level that does not degrade structure or jeopardize the ability of the airplane to carry its intended design loads.

Full article is here: http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/aero_07/corrosn.html

Saturday, July 26, 2008

ALUMINUM MASTER ALLOYS AND ADDITIVES “THE MAGIC INGREDIENTS”

The U.S. Aluminum Industry is the world’s largest, producing about 20 billion pounds of metal annually. The industry employed 141,000 people with an annual payroll of $5.2 billion and shipped $38.8 billion in products in 2000. The high quality of these products and the profitability of the industry are due, in large part, to the contributions of a niche industry made up of the Master Alloys and Additives companies. These companies have dedicated their efforts to providing the Aluminum Industry with special alloys and additives that reduce manufacturing cycle time and enhance product quality. Some of their contributions to the aluminum industry are presented below.

http://www.aluminum.org/Content/NavigationMenu/TheIndustry/MasterAlloys/default.htm

Friday, July 25, 2008

Bruker AXS Expands Instrumentation Product Line for Die Casting Analysis with World's First Handheld XRF to Include Silicon Drift Detector


Bruker AXS announces another technology breakthrough for the die casting industry with the introduction of its new TRACERturboSDTM, the world's first handheld X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) instrument that uses a Silicon Drift Detector (SDD) for dramatically improved speed, sensitivity and resolution. Bruker's industry-leading proprietary XFlashTM SDD, previously available only in high-performance laboratory XRF instruments, now offers unprecedented speed and analytical specificity when integrated into the novel handheld TRACERturboSD
With this announcement, the Bruker AXS Handheld business, until recently known as Keymaster Technologies Inc., builds on its long tradition of technology leadership in the handheld XRF industry that includes:

2001 - First tube-based handheld XRF
2004 - First vacuum handheld XRF, co-invented with NASA
2008 - First SDD-based handheld XRF


The revolutionary TRACERturboSD with integrated SDD offers unparalleled speed, sensitivity and energy resolution, previously found only in more expensive laboratory systems. Now all handheld XRF customer segments can benefit from these compelling performance advantages in their analytical work. In the aerospace metals industry, the proprietary Bruker SDD technology enables TRACERturboSD users to better and faster analyze sophisticated light element alloys, even without the use of a vacuum or helium attachment. In the general metals analysis markets, the Bruker TRACERturboSD offers higher speed, sensitivity and selectivity for many demanding handheld XRF applications.

This detector provides a major improvement in the analytical performance of handheld alloy analyzers. The measurement precision is improved by a factor of two to three times, in addition to making the measurement of light elements such as Mg, Al and Si possible when operating in air mode. The TRACERturboSD provides a new capability of measuring aluminum in titanium alloys and magnesium and silicon in aluminum alloys, with no vacuum or helium required. For additional sensitivity, the well-known joint Bruker-NASA vacuum technology can be combined with the SDD to provide the best sensitivity possible in a handheld XRF instrument.

The TRACER turboSD includes all of the standard features of the highly-regarded Bruker S1 Tracer analyzer, such as Grade ID and chemistry, a unique PASS/FAIL analysis capability and the largest Grade library in the industry. The capabilities of the TRACERturboSD make it the ideal analyzer for the measurement of all types of alloys. In addition to the new high-end TRACERturboSD, Bruker AXS continues to offer the standard S1 TracerTM handheld instrument with traditional SiPIN diode technology for routine analysis

John Landefeld, Vice President of Bruker AXS Handheld, stated: "This breakthrough continues our tradition of technology leadership, going back to the initial introduction of tube-based XRF handhelds in 2001. Following the joint NASA-Bruker development of vacuum technology for handhelds in 2004, Bruker proves, once again, to be the overall technology leader in handheld XRF instrumentation, especially in the metals industries."



"The die casting industry will be particularly pleased to find that high-end handheld XRF can now approach the capabilities of laboratory systems," added John Patterson, Director of Marketing and Product Management of Bruker AXS Handheld.
For more TRACERturboSD information, please visit: www.bruker-axs.com/handheld.


Monday, July 14, 2008

Why Aluminum May Glow Like Gold

by William Pentland 06.03.08, 2:05 PM ET

Since gold, grain and oil prices soared to previously unfathomable heights, everyone wants to know what's next. The answer may be aluminum.

Last Friday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) amended an obscure clean water regulation that restricted use of aluminum in automobiles because of a potentially harmful byproduct created in the manufacturing process.

Car makers treat aluminum to increase protection from corrosion in multiple ways, but the cheapest is an adhesive bonding process that uses zinc phosphate. Since the early 1980s, the EPA has included waste created from zinc phosphate processing on its list of FO19 hazardous wastes, which requires expensive additional treatment. The process apparently creates high concentrations of potentially harmful water contaminants.

The restriction drove up the cost of aluminum car components by forcing car makers to implement expensive clean-up systems. As a result, last week's amendment will substantially reduce the cost of aluminum-based car components, which will likely accelerate the industry's plans to replace vast amounts of steel currently used in cars with aluminum.

Although the EPA began its formal review of the aluminum restriction in 2006, the agency's decision appeared earlier than expected, which industry insiders imagined would not appear until later this year or early next year. The timing could reflect the Bush administration's desire that all major regulatory changes be initiated by June 1 to make sure they are finalized before the next president takes office, as reported May 31 by The New York Times.

Despite an industry-wide consensus that aluminum prices would fall in 2008, the opposite has happened. Prices have climbed nearly 25% since January. Since April, banks, including Goldman Sachs (nyse: GS - news - people ), UBS (nyse: UBS - news - people ), Lehman Brothers (nyse: LEH - news - people ) and Citigroup (nyse: C - news - people ), have raised forecasts for aluminum. Alcoa's (nyse: AA - news - people ) stock price has also soared.

Several industry analysts have revised their forecasts for aluminum prices in recent months. On Friday, aluminum prices in the futures market exploded.

Congress' recent decision to raise fuel efficiency requirements has intensified the auto industry's interest in lightweight materials. Aluminum could reduce the weight of cars dramatically because it weighs roughly half as much as steel. Every 10% reduction in car weight results in a 6% to 8% decrease in gasoline consumption.

Although advanced materials like carbon fiber weigh less than aluminum and are several times stronger than steel, they would require substantial upgrades of extant manufacturing facilities to implement. However, aluminum is compatible with current large-volume manufacturing facilities and body shops that would be expensive to overhaul.

"If you can stamp it, you want to stick with steel or aluminum," Mark Verbrugge, director of General Motors' Materials and Processes Lab, told Design News magazine earlier this year. "If you want to accentuate styling, composites are a better bet. But for the mainstream, composites are having a tough time competing with existing technologies."
The aluminum industry has presented the agency's decision in terms of environmental benefits that it claims will accrue from the de-listing.

"Every pound of aluminum used in a car reduces CO2 emissions by 20 pounds over 100,000 miles," the aluminum industry claims in a lobbying document. "Fifteen million aluminum intensive vehicles containing 250 pounds of aluminum would: save 3.5 billion gallons of gasoline [and] reduce CO2 emissions by 37.5 million tons."

Yet any cuts in carbon emissions might be outweighed by the negative affect aluminum could have on water supplies. And from the looks of things, car makers have already begun using aluminum--extensively.

The 2008 Ford Focus will use high-strength aluminum to replace steel in front-brake calipers. The new aluminum brakes will weigh 7.5 pounds less than their steel predecessor. In addition, two-thirds of the new Ford Focus fleet will have aluminum wheels, which will weigh 22 pounds less than previous models.

Since 1997, the EPA has granted a dozen exemptions to the rule for specific auto manufacturing facilities across the U.S., which has considerably increased the use of aluminum in the automobile industry. Last week's decision could trump those increases by an order of magnitude.
Ford has developed a prototype vehicle--the P2000--that replaces steel and cast iron in several key components as part of an effort to reduce the weight of a vehicle by 40%, which would create dramatic fuel efficiencies. Ford's prototype will increase the aluminum content by 256% over previous models, according to a report conducted by Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Center for Transportation Analysis. Other car makers have also developed aluminum-based prototypes.

A separate study conducted by the Center for Transportation Analysis in 2001 evaluated the environmental impact likely to result from the increased use of aluminum in automobiles. The analysis did not address water contamination, which at the time would have been avoided, since the EPA rule remained in force. Instead, the study expressed a primary concern with aluminum's environmental impact during its extraction process: "The largest single contributor to the total waste of [light weight materials being considered for cars] is aluminum, the extraction of which produces large volumes of mineral waste."

The study also noted that while the increase in aluminum use would have the most severe affects in Washington, New York, Oregon, West Virginia and Ohio, "Every region in the United States could potentially experience some change in environmental impact with the introduction of new automotive materials."

Source: Forbes.com

Custom Search